0.00/0.10	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.10/0.11	% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3FdVSC1XJ6 true
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.31	% DateTime : Mon Jul  3 03:14:23 EDT 2023
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.31	% Running portfolio for 1440 s
0.10/0.31	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.10/0.31	% Number of cores: 8
0.10/0.32	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.10/0.32	% Running in HO mode
0.16/0.59	% Total configuration time : 828
0.16/0.59	% Estimated wc time : 1656
0.16/0.59	% Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
1.04/0.67	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
1.04/0.67	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
1.04/0.67	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
1.04/0.68	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
1.04/0.68	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
1.04/0.68	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
1.04/0.68	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
1.04/0.70	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
1.33/0.73	% /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s
1.37/0.81	% Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
1.37/0.81	% done 3 iterations in 0.105s
1.37/0.81	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
1.37/0.81	% SZS output start Refutation
1.37/0.81	thf(sk__type, type, sk_: ((($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o) > ($o > $o) > $o).
1.37/0.81	thf(sk__1_type, type, sk__1: ((($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o) > $o > $o).
1.37/0.81	thf(choiceoo, conjecture,
1.37/0.81	  (?[C:( ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o > $o )]:
1.37/0.81	   ( ![P:( ( $o > $o ) > $o )]:
1.37/0.81	     ( ( ?[X:( $o > $o )]: ( P @ X ) ) => ( P @ ( C @ P ) ) ) ))).
1.37/0.81	thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
1.37/0.81	  (~( ?[C:( ( ( $o > $o ) > $o ) > $o > $o )]:
1.37/0.81	      ( ![P:( ( $o > $o ) > $o )]:
1.37/0.81	        ( ( ?[X:( $o > $o )]: ( P @ X ) ) => ( P @ ( C @ P ) ) ) ) )),
1.37/0.81	  inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [choiceoo])).
1.37/0.81	thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
1.37/0.81	    (![X0 : (($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:  (sk_ @ X0 @ (sk__1 @ X0))),
1.37/0.81	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
1.37/0.81	thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
1.37/0.81	    (![X0 : (($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]: ~ (sk_ @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sk_ @ X0)))),
1.37/0.81	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
1.37/0.81	thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
1.37/0.81	    (![X0 : (($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o, X2 : $o > $o]:
1.37/0.81	       (~ (sk_ @ X0 @ X2) |  (sk_ @ X0 @ ((($$choice) @ (sk_ @ X0)))))),
1.37/0.81	    inference('inst_choice((sk_ @ X0))', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1])).
1.37/0.81	thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
1.37/0.81	    (![X0 : (($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]:
1.37/0.81	        (sk_ @ X0 @ ((($$choice) @ (sk_ @ X0))))),
1.37/0.81	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl3])).
1.37/0.81	thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
1.37/0.81	    (![X0 : (($o > $o) > $o) > $o > $o]: ~ (sk_ @ X0 @ (X0 @ (sk_ @ X0)))),
1.37/0.81	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
1.37/0.81	thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain, ($false),
1.37/0.81	    inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl1])).
1.37/0.81	
1.37/0.81	% SZS output end Refutation
1.37/0.81	
1.37/0.81	
1.37/0.81	% Terminating...
1.99/0.90	% Runner terminated.
2.17/0.92	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
2.17/0.92	EOF